4.5 Article

Vegetation structural composition mapping of a complex landscape using forest cover density transformation and random decision forest classifier: a comparison

Journal

GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2023.2220289

Keywords

Vegetation structural composition; complex landscape; forest cover density; random decision forest

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the capabilities of forest cover density (FCD) transformation and random decision forest (RDF) classification in complex tropical landscapes. Landsat-8 OLI imagery was used for vegetation structural composition mapping in Central Java, Indonesia. The FCD transformation achieved an accuracy of 69.32%, while the RDF classification achieved accuracies ranging from 70.76% to 75.19% depending on the parameter setting.
Forest cover density (FCD) transformation and random decision forest (RDF) classification have been widely used for vegetation mapping. Nevertheless, a comparison of their capabilities in complex tropical landscapes is still rarely carried out. This study compared the two methods using Landsat-8 OLI imagery which includes the blue up to thermal bands for vegetation structural composition mapping in a complex landscape of Central Java, Indonesia. We used the FCD transformation with six indices to generate 11 classes, while the RDF classified the same 11 classes based on training areas and used a random process involving various number of splits and trees. The results showed that the FCD transformation achieved 69.32% accuracy, while the RDF was able to classify the 11 classes with various accuracies depending on the parameter setting, i.e. from 70.76% to 75.19%. Regarding the obtained accuracies, problems associated with the terrain and vegetation characteristics have been discussed for further recommendation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available