4.4 Review

Optimizing adenoma detection in screening-related colonoscopy

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 589-602

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2212159

Keywords

Adenoma; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; endoscopy; prevention; screening

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Screening-related colonoscopy is crucial for diagnosing and preventing colorectal cancer. This review summarizes the available evidence on strategies and techniques to improve adenoma detection rates. The importance of colonoscopy quality indicators is emphasized given the high prevalence and impact of colorectal cancer.
IntroductionScreening-related colonoscopy is a vital component of screening initiatives to both diagnose and prevent colorectal cancer (CRC), with prevention being reliant upon early and accurate detection of pre-malignant lesions. Several strategies, techniques, and interventions exist to optimize endoscopists' adenoma detection rates (ADR).Areas coveredThis narrative review provides an overview of the importance of ADR and other colonoscopy quality indicators. It then summarizes the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of the following domains in terms of improving ADR: endoscopist factors, pre-procedural parameters, peri-procedural parameters, intra-procedural strategies and techniques, antispasmodics, distal attachment devices, enhanced colonoscopy technologies, enhanced optics, and artificial intelligence. These summaries are based on an electronic search of the databases Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane performed on 12 December 2022.Expert opinionGiven the prevalence and associated morbidity and mortality of CRC, the quality of screening-related colonoscopy quality is appropriately prioritized by patients, endoscopists, units, and payers alike. Endoscopists performing colonoscopy should be up to date regarding available strategies, techniques, and interventions to optimize their performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available