4.5 Article

Coronary microvascular health in symptomatic patients with prior COVID-19 infection: an updated analysis

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jead118

Keywords

COVID; PET; coronary microvascular dysfunction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the effects of prior COVID-19 on coronary microvasculature. By considering factors such as time from infection, disease severity, SARS-CoV-2 variants, and subgroups of patients with diabetes and those with no known coronary artery disease, the study compared the myocardial flow reserve (MFR) between patients with previous COVID-19 and controls. The results showed that patients with prior COVID-19 had a significantly higher risk of impaired MFR.
Aims Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with endothelial dysfunction. We aimed to determine the effects of prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the coronary microvasculature accounting for time from COVID-19, disease severity, SARS-CoV-2 variants, and in subgroups of patients with diabetes and those with no known coronary artery disease. Methods and results Cases consisted of patients with previous COVID-19 who had clinically indicated positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and were matched 1:3 on clinical and cardiovascular risk factors to controls having no prior infection. Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) was calculated as the ratio of stress to rest myocardial blood flow (MBF) in mL/min/g of the left ventricle. Comparisons between cases and controls were made for the odds and prevalence of impaired MFR (MFR < 2). We included 271 cases matched to 815 controls (mean +/- SD age 65 +/- 12 years, 52% men). The median (inter-quartile range) number of days between COVID-19 infection and PET imaging was 174 (58-338) days. Patients with prior COVID-19 had a statistically significant higher odds of MFR <2 (adjusted odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 2.8-4.25 P < 0.001). Results were similar in clinically meaningful subgroups. The proportion of cases with MFR Conclusion The prevalence of impaired MFR is similar by duration of time from infection up to 1 year and SARS-CoV-2 variants, but significantly differs by severity of infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available