4.5 Review

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of pericardial diseases: a comprehensive guide

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 983-998

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jead092

Keywords

pericardial diseases; pericarditis; cardiac magnetic resonance; late gadolinium enhancement; constriction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is an important diagnostic tool for assessing pericardial diseases, providing detailed information on cardiac anatomy and function, as well as detecting pericardial inflammation and effusion. CMR has high diagnostic accuracy for non-invasive detection of constrictive physiology and can guide treatment decisions for recurrent pericarditis. This article serves as a primer for reporting physicians, summarizing CMR protocols, interpreting major findings, and discussing the strengths and weaknesses of CMR in pericardial diseases.
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has been established as a valuable diagnostic tool in the assessment of pericardial diseases by providing information on cardiac anatomy and function, surrounding extra-cardiac structures, pericardial thickening and effusion, characterization of pericardial effusion, and the presence of active pericardial inflammation from the same scan. In addition, CMR imaging has excellent diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive detection of constrictive physiology evading the need for invasive catheterization in most instances. Growing evidence in the field suggests that pericardial enhancement on CMR is not only diagnostic of pericarditis but also has prognostic value for pericarditis recurrence, although such evidence is derived from small patient cohorts. CMR findings could also be used to guide treatment de-escalation or up-titration in recurrent pericarditis and selecting patients most likely to benefit from novel treatments such as anakinra and rilonacept. This article is an overview of the CMR applications in pericardial syndromes as a primer for reporting physicians. We sought to provide a summary of the clinical protocols used and an interpretation of the major CMR findings in the setting of pericardial diseases. We also discuss points that are less well clear and delineate the strengths and weak points of CMR in pericardial diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available