4.8 Article

XCR1+DCs are critical for T cell-mediated immunotherapy of chronic viral infections

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112123

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The contribution of XCR1+ dendritic cells (DCs) and SIRPa+ DCs in maintaining T cell function during exhaustion and immunotherapeutic interventions of chronic infections is poorly understood. In a mouse model of chronic LCMV infection, XCR1+ DCs were found to be more resistant to infection and highly activated compared to SIRPa+ DCs. Exploiting XCR1+ DCs through expansion or vaccination improved CD8+ T cell functionality and virus control. PD-L1 blockade was found to be more effective when combined with increased frequency of XCR1+ DCs, enhancing the functionality of exhausted CD8+ T cell subsets.
The contribution of cross-presenting XCR1+ dendritic cells (DCs) and SIRPa+ DCs in maintaining T cell function during exhaustion and immunotherapeutic interventions of chronic infections remains poorly characterized. Using the mouse model of chronic LCMV infection, we found that XCR1+ DCs are more resistant to infection and highly activated compared with SIRPa+ DCs. Exploiting XCR1+ DCs via Flt3L-mediated expansion or XCR1-targeted vaccination notably reinvigorates CD8+ T cells and improves virus control. Upon PD-L1 blockade, XCR1+ DCs are not required for the proliferative burst of progenitor exhausted CD8+ T (TPEX) cells but are indispensable to sustain the functionality of exhausted CD8+ T (TEX) cells. Combining anti-PD-L1 ther-apy with increased frequency of XCR1+ DCs improves functionality of TPEX and TEX subsets, while increase of SIRPa+ DCs dampened their proliferation. Together, this demonstrates that XCR1+ DCs are crucial for the suc-cess of checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies through differential activation of exhausted CD8+ T cell subsets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available