4.8 Article

Phenotypic heterogeneity in the bacterial oxidative stress response is driven by cell-cell interactions

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112168

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetically identical bacterial cells often exhibit different phenotypes, which is commonly explained as a bet-hedging strategy against unpredictable environmental threats. However, this study reveals that phenotypic heterogeneity in Escherichia coli's stress response to hydrogen peroxide stress has a fundamentally different basis. Through microfluidic experiments, it is found that the heterogeneity arises from precise and rapid feedback between individual cells and their immediate environment. Furthermore, cell-cell interactions play a crucial role in shielding each other from hydrogen peroxide, resulting in a collective phenotype that protects a significant portion of the population.
Genetically identical bacterial cells commonly display different phenotypes. This phenotypic heterogeneity is well known for stress responses, where it is often explained as bet hedging against unpredictable environ-mental threats. Here, we explore phenotypic heterogeneity in a major stress response of Escherichia coli and find it has a fundamentally different basis. We characterize the response of cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) stress in a microfluidic device under constant growth conditions. A machine-learning model reveals that phenotypic heterogeneity arises from a precise and rapid feedback between each cell and its im-mediate environment. Moreover, we find that the heterogeneity rests upon cell-cell interaction, whereby cells shield each other from H2O2 via their individual stress responses. Our work shows how phenotypic hetero-geneity in bacterial stress responses can emerge from short-range cell-cell interactions and result in a col-lective phenotype that protects a large proportion of the population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available