4.8 Article

Helicobacter spp. are prevalent in wild mice and protect from lethal Citrobacter rodentium infection in the absence of adaptive immunity

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112549

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transfer of wild mouse gut microbiota to laboratory mice enhances immune status and resistance to diseases, with Helicobacter spp. being enriched in wild mice. Experiments with non-SPF Helicobacter spp. in mice show interference with Citrobacter rodentium colonization and gut inflammation, suggesting a protective function against intestinal infection. Results indicate that Helicobacter spp. interfere with C. rodentium tissue attachment, potentially by reducing mucus-derived sugars.
Transfer of the gut microbiota from wild to laboratory mice alters the host's immune status and enhances resistance to infectious and metabolic diseases, but understanding of which microbes and how they promote host fitness is only emerging. Our analysis of metagenomic sequencing data reveals that Helicobacter spp. are enriched in wild compared with specific-pathogen-free (SPF) and conventionally housed mice, with mul-tiple species commonly co-colonizing their hosts. We create laboratory mice harboring three non-SPF Hel-icobacter spp. to evaluate their effect on mucosal immunity and colonization resistance to the enteropatho-gen Citrobacter rodentium. Our experiments reveal that Helicobacter spp. interfere with C. rodentium colonization and attenuate C. rodentium-induced gut inflammation in wild-type (WT) mice, even preventing lethal infection in Rag2-/-SPF mice. Further analyses suggest that Helicobacter spp. interfere with tissue attachment of C. rodentium, putatively by reducing the availability of mucus-derived sugars. These results unveil pivotal protective functions of wild mouse microbiota constituents against intestinal infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available