4.6 Article

Compliance and patient satisfaction with treatment settings recommended by the medical on-call service 116117 in Germany using computer-assisted structured initial assessment: a cross-sectional observational study accompanying the demand intervention

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070475

Keywords

ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; Organisation of health services; PRIMARY CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed compliance and patient satisfaction of computer-assisted initial assessment implemented at the medical on-call service 116117. The results showed that most patients complied with the recommendations and were satisfied with the service. However, lower compliance and satisfaction were found in GP practices, but nonetheless, two of three patients with respective recommendations were willing to use this setting.
ObjectivesIn order to reduce the use of emergency departments, computer-assisted initial assessment was implemented at the medical on-call service 116117. Our study assessed compliance and patient satisfaction.DesignCross-sectional observational postal survey.SettingMedical on-call service 116117 by eight Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Germany.ParticipantsThe intervention was observed between January 2020 and March 2021. Minors and patients with invalid contact data were excluded. A random sample of eligible patients received standardised questionnaires by mail.Outcome measuresWe analysed associations of sociodemographic data, health status, previous service use, health literacy, and recommended settings with compliance and patient satisfaction by multivariable, multilevel logistic regression.InterventionsBased on symptoms and context factors, the computer software suggested service levels. Staff and patient discussed if higher levels were indicated, services were available and self-transport was possible. They then agreed on recommendations for treatment settings.ResultsOf 9473 contacted eligible patients, 1756 patients (18.5%) participated. Median age was 66 years (IQR=50-79), and 986 (59.0%) were women. At least one recommended setting was used by 1397 patients (85.4%). General practitioner (GP) practices were used by 143 patients (68.4%). Generally, better compliance was associated with lower depression levels (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.17, p=0.003), fewer previous hospital stays (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.23, p=0.003) and recommendations for any setting other than GP practices (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.29, p<0001, to OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.72, p=0.003). A total of 606 patients (50.7%) were completely satisfied. Patient satisfaction was associated with higher age (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.49, p<0.001), better self-rated health (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.53, p=0.002), not having musculoskeletal disorders (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.94, p=0.021), better health literacy (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.89, p=0.005, and OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.67, p<0.001) and receiving no recommendation for GP practices (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.87, p=0.006).ConclusionsMost patients were compliant and satisfied. Lowest compliance and satisfaction were found in GP practices, but nonetheless, two of three patients with respective recommendations were willing to use this setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available