4.6 Article

'It's just a finger isn't it...': patients' perspectives of recovery following finger fractures and participation in surgical trials - a qualitative interview study

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065185

Keywords

orthopaedic & trauma surgery; quality in health care; adult orthopaedics; hand & wrist; musculoskeletal disorders; orthopaedic sports trauma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to generate detailed data about finger injury experience and treatment from patients' perspectives, and understand their attitudes towards research involvement. The results show that finger injuries can have a greater impact on people's lives than expected, and patients need more support. Factors such as age, job, lifestyle, and hobbies influence treatment experience and willingness to participate in hand research. Patients prefer studies comparing variants of the same treatment over studies comparing different modalities.
ObjectivesTo (1) generate detailed, person-centred data about the experience of finger injury and treatment and (2) understand the patients' perspectives of research involvement with a view to informing better designed future studies in hand injury.DesignQualitative study using semistructured interviews and framework analysis.Participants19 participants who were part of the Cohort study of Patients' Outcomes for Finger Fractures and Joint Injuries study in a single secondary care centre in the UK.ResultsThe results of this study showed that although finger injuries are frequently seen as minor by patients and healthcare professionals, their effects on peoples' lives are possibly greater than first anticipated. The relative importance of hand functioning means that the experience of treatment and recovery varies and is shaped by an individual's age, job, lifestyle and hobbies. These factors will also inform an individual's perspective on and willingness to participate in, hand research. Interviewees showed reluctance to accept randomisation in surgical trials. Interviewees would be more likely to participate in a study testing two variants of the same treatment modality (eg, surgery vs surgery), rather than two different modalities, (eg, surgery vs splint). The Patient-Reported Outcome Measure questionnaires that were used in this study were seen as less relevant by these patients. Pain, hand function and cosmetic appearance were considered important, meaningful outcomes.ConclusionsPatients with finger injuries need more support from healthcare professionals as they may experience more problems than first anticipated. Good communication by clinicians and empathy can help patients engage with the treatment pathway. Perceptions of an 'insignificant' injury and/or need for quick functional recovery will influence recruitment to future hand research (both positively and negatively). Accessible information about the functional and clinical consequences of a hand injury will be important in enabling participants to make fully informed decisions about participation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available