4.6 Article

Association between frailty, chronic conditions and socioeconomic status in community-dwelling older adults attending primary care: a cross-sectional study using practice-based research network data

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066269

Keywords

PRIMARY CARE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; Information management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to investigate the associations between frailty levels and chronic conditions and socioeconomic status. The study found that as frailty levels increased, the prevalence of chronic diseases also increased, and there were significant associations with low income and high material deprivation in the community. Therefore, the study emphasizes the need for a health equity approach in frailty care, and demonstrates the utility and feasibility of collecting patient-level data in primary care to provide targeted interventions for those with the greatest need.
ObjectivesFrailty is a multidimensional syndrome of loss of reserves in energy, physical ability, cognition and general health. Primary care is key in preventing and managing frailty, mindful of the social dimensions that contribute to its risk, prognosis and appropriate patient support. We studied associations between frailty levels and both chronic conditions and socioeconomic status (SES).DesignCross-sectional cohort studySettingA practice-based research network (PBRN) in Ontario, Canada, providing primary care to 38 000 patients. The PBRN hosts a regularly updated database containing deidentified, longitudinal, primary care practice data.ParticipantsPatients aged 65 years or older, with a recent encounter, rostered to family physicians at the PBRN.InterventionPhysicians assigned a frailty score to patients using the 9-point Clinical Frailty Scale. We linked frailty scores to chronic conditions and neighbourhood-level SES to examine associations between these three domains.ResultsAmong 2043 patients assessed, the prevalence of low (scoring 1-3), medium (scoring 4-6) and high (scoring 7-9) frailty was 55.8%, 40.3%, and 3.8%, respectively. The prevalence of five or more chronic diseases was 11% among low-frailty, 26% among medium-frailty and 44% among high-frailty groups (chi(2)=137.92, df 2, p<0.001). More disabling conditions appeared in the top 50% of conditions in the highest-frailty group compared with the low and medium groups. Increasing frailty was significantly associated with lower neighbourhood income (chi(2)=61.42, df 8, p<0.001) and higher neighbourhood material deprivation (chi(2)=55.24, df 8, p<0.001).ConclusionThis study demonstrates the triple disadvantage of frailty, disease burden and socioeconomic disadvantage. Frailty care needs a health equity approach: we demonstrate the utility and feasibility of collecting patient-level data within primary care. Such data can relate social risk factors, frailty and chronic disease towards flagging patients with the greatest need and creating targeted interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available