4.6 Article

Can we do better? A qualitative study in the East of England investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Faecal immunochemical tests safely enhance rational use of resources during the assessment of suspected symptomatic colorectal cancer in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis

Noel Pin-Vieito et al.

Summary: The implementation of FIT as a triage test in primary healthcare can improve referral efficiency without missing cases of CRC. FIT at a threshold of 10 μg/g shows a high sensitivity of 87.2% for CRC, while less than one additional CRC would be missed per 1000 patients investigated at a threshold of 20 μg Hb/g faeces.
Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in patients with signs or symptoms of suspected colorectal cancer (CRC): a joint guideline from the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)

Kevin J. Monahan et al.

Summary: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has high sensitivity for detecting colorectal cancer (CRC). This guideline aims to provide a clear strategy for using FIT in the diagnostic pathway of people with signs or symptoms of a suspected CRC diagnosis. The guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary group and includes evidence-based recommendations and research priorities.
Article Medicine, General & Internal

Who are the patients being offered the faecal immunochemical test in routine English general practice, and for what symptoms? A prospective descriptive study

Natalia Calanzani et al.

Summary: This study investigated the use of the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in primary care practice for lower-risk patients with symptoms of colorectal cancer. The results showed that almost a quarter of the patients tested positive with FIT, but there was low agreement between patient-reported symptoms and GP-recorded symptoms.

BMJ OPEN (2022)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Identifying modifiable features of home bowel cancer screening kits to facilitate use: consumer perspectives

Belinda C. Goodwin et al.

Summary: This study aimed to identify features of home bowel screening kits that could be modified to increase their use through consultation with kit recipients. The findings identified six modifiable elements, including the collection tool, collection sheet, specimen container, instruction, packaging and processes. The participants preferred collection devices that limited users' proximity to faecal matter, smaller packaging, simpler processes, and step-by-step pictorial instructions.

PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE (2022)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Adoption of faecal immunochemical testing for 2-week-wait colorectal patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational cohort study reporting a new service at a regional centre

William Maclean et al.

Summary: The study shows that incorporating FIT for triage can optimize the allocation of limited resources and improve the efficiency in managing patients who require urgent colonic investigation for detecting colorectal cancer.

COLORECTAL DISEASE (2021)

Article Oncology

Diagnostic performance of a faecal immunochemical test for patients with low-risk symptoms of colorectal cancer in primary care: an evaluation in the South West of England

Sarah E. R. Bailey et al.

Summary: This study found that the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) performed well in triaging patients with low-risk symptoms of colorectal cancer, with a positive predictive value of 7.0%, a negative predictive value of 99.8%, a sensitivity of 84.3%, and a specificity of 85.0%.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Two sides of every coin: individuals' experiences of undergoing colorectal cancer screening by faecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy

Johanna Wangmar et al.

Summary: The acceptability of colorectal cancer screening procedures is crucial for the success of screening programs. This study explored how individuals experience CRC screening, finding that experiences vary from having no worries to experiencing bothersome emotions, logistical concerns, inconsistent information, and unmet expectations. Improving patient experiences may involve using one-sample FITs, optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopies, and delivering clear information and emotional support at the right time.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance

Kathryn Skivington et al.

Summary: The UK Medical Research Council's new guidance framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions, commissioned jointly with the National Institute for Health Research, considers recent developments in theory and methods to maximize research efficiency, use, and impact.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)

Article Primary Health Care

Patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic faecal immunochemical testing: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods evaluation

Natalie Gil et al.

Summary: Recent research explored patient experience and satisfaction with symptomatic FIT in an 'early adopter' site in England. The study found that satisfaction with FIT was high, but satisfaction with GP consultation and receiving results was lower. Efforts to improve satisfaction should focus on ensuring that patients understand the purpose of the test and always receive their test results.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Measuring patient experience of diagnostic care and acceptability of testing

Alice S. Forster et al.

Summary: A positive patient experience is crucial for high-quality health services, but diagnostic care is often overlooked in patient experience assessments. It is important to assess the experience of diagnostic services and the acceptability of tests separately in order to enhance patient-centered care and support patient choice.

DIAGNOSIS (2021)

Letter Surgery

Navigating the storm of COVID-19 for patients with suspected bowel cancer

N. D'Souza et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2020)

Review Oncology

Evolving perspectives on stool testing for colorectal cancer: a qualitative systematic review

Yip Han Chin et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION (2020)

Editorial Material Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Faecal immunochemical testing in the COVID-19 era: balancing risk and costs

Ramesh P. Arasaradnam et al.

LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY (2020)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in young adults in Europe over the last 25 years

Fanny E. R. Vuik et al.

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Changes in colorectal cancer incidence in seven high-income countries: a population-based study

Marzieh Araghi et al.

LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY (2019)

Article Oncology

Increasing Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults

Holli A. Loomans-Kropp et al.

JOURNAL OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Article Primary Health Care

Patient perspectives on test result communication in primary care: a qualitative study

Ian J. Litchfield et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE (2015)

Review Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Advances in Fecal Occult Blood Tests: The FIT Revolution

Graeme P. Young et al.

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES (2015)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

Nicola K. Gale et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2013)

Review Psychology, Clinical

The Model of Pathways to Treatment: Conceptualization and integration with existing theory

S. E. Scott et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY (2013)

Review Health Policy & Services

The Andersen Model of Total Patient Delay: a systematic review of its application in cancer diagnosis

Fiona Walter et al.

JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY (2012)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

Allison Tong et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE (2007)