4.4 Article

Reference-free self-calibrating tip-based scattering-type THz near-field microscopy

Journal

AIP ADVANCES
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0152141

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a quantitative analysis model based on reference-free self-calibration is proposed for the analysis of scattered fields and approach curves on a dielectric substrate in terahertz scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy. The model is compared with experimental data and numerical analysis, showing good agreement. It is used to extract the effective tip radius and substrate relative permittivity. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using the model for accurate measurement of geometric and optical parameters in a tip-based THz scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscope.
In this work, we present a quantitative analysis model based on reference-free self-calibration to analyze scattered fields and approach curves on a dielectric substrate for terahertz scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy. The results of our model are compared with experimentally measured data and a fully numerical analysis based on a line dipole image method and a quasi-electrostatic approximation. The model is used to extract the effective radius of the tip and the relative permittivity of the silicon substrate to the near-field scattering signal. The measured approach curves on Au and silicon substrates show good agreement with the calculated approach curves, and the refractive index for silicon is precisely determined to be 3.42. For a tip-based THz scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscope, the proposed analysis model allows for the extraction of the effective probe radius and dielectric functions, thereby enabling conclusive measurements of geometric parameters and optical constants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available