4.6 Article

ARbility: re-inviting older wheelchair users to in-store shopping via wearable augmented reality

Journal

VIRTUAL REALITY
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 1919-1936

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10055-023-00769-0

Keywords

Augmented reality; Accessibility; Object detection; Wheelchair users

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the needs and issues of older wheelchair users in outdoor activities and proposed ARbility, a wearable AR-based shopping system. ARbility supports product recognition and one-stop shopping functionality for wheelchair users, reducing physical loads. User evaluation showed a 33% decrease in arm movement, with participants validating its effectiveness and usability. The study concludes with implications on how a wearable AR-based shopping system supports active aging and inclusion of older wheelchair users.
Engaging in outdoor daily activities such as shopping is an essential, yet challenging activity for older wheelchair users (OWU). However, little is investigated on how to augment the OWU's independence during their in-person shopping experiences, specifically by addressing their physical conditions. We first conducted semi-structured interviews and a large-scale survey with 77 people in total to discover OWU's needs and pain points in comparison with those of general older adults or wheelchair population. Based on these findings, we propose ARbility, a wearable AR-based shopping system for OWU which supports product recognition from seated positions on wheelchairs and one-stop shopping functionality for minimizing physical loads. In our user evaluation with 13 OWU in a real-world environment, ARbility demonstrated 33% decrease in arm movement, with the participants validating its efficacy and usability in qualitative interviews. We conclude with implications on how a wearable AR-based shopping system supports the active aging and inclusion of OWU.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available