4.7 Article

Evaluation of the main regulators of systemic iron homeostasis in pyruvate kinase deficiency

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31571-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated iron homeostasis and dyserythropoiesis in pyruvate kinase deficiency (PKD) patients. The results showed that PKD patients had intermediate levels of sTfR, hepcidin, ERFE, and EPO between CDAII and HS. PKD patients also exhibited higher levels of sTfR and similar levels of EPO compared to CDAII, but both higher than in HS.
Iron homeostasis and dyserythropoiesis are poorly investigated in pyruvate kinase deficiency (PKD), the most common glycolytic defect of erythrocytes. Herein, we studied the main regulators of iron balance and erythropoiesis, as soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), hepcidin, erythroferrone (ERFE), and erythropoietin (EPO), in a cohort of 41 PKD patients, compared with 42 affected by congenital dyserythropoietic anemia type II (CDAII) and 50 with hereditary spherocytosis (HS). PKD patients showed intermediate values of hepcidin and ERFE between CDAII and HS, and clear negative correlations between log-transformed hepcidin and log-EPO (Person's r correlation coefficient = - 0.34), log-hepcidin and log-ERFE (r = - 0.47), and log-hepcidin and sTfR (r = - 0.44). sTfR was significantly higher in PKD; EPO levels were similar in PKD and CDAII, both higher than in HS. Finally, genotype-phenotype correlation in PKD showed that more severe patients, carrying non-missense/non-missense genotypes, had lower hepcidin and increased ERFE, EPO, and sTFR compared with the others (missense/missense and missense/non-missense), suggesting a higher rate of ineffective erythropoiesis. We herein investigated the main regulators of systemic iron homeostasis in the largest cohort of PKD patients described so far, opening new perspectives on the molecular basis and therapeutic approaches of this disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available