Face masks are less effective than sunglasses in masking face identity

The effect of covering faces on face identification is recently garnering interest amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we investigated how face identification performance was affected by two types of face disguise: sunglasses and face masks. Observers studied a series of faces; then judged whether a series of test faces, comprising studied and novel faces, had been studied before or not. Face stimuli were presented either without coverings (full faces), wearing sunglasses covering the upper region (eyes, eyebrows), or wearing surgical masks covering the lower region (nose, mouth, chin). We found that sunglasses led to larger reductions in sensitivity (d') to face identity than face masks did, while both disguises increased the tendency to report faces as studied before, a bias that was absent for full faces. In addition, faces disguised during either study or test only (i.e. study disguised faces, test with full faces; and vice versa) led to further reductions in sensitivity from both studying and testing with disguised faces, suggesting that congruence between study and test is crucial for memory retrieval. These findings implied that the upper region of the face, including the eye-region features, is more diagnostic for holistic face-identity processing than the lower face region.

Automated summary

The study examined the effects of face disguise on face identification during the COVID-19 pandemic. Two types of face disguise, sunglasses and face masks, were used. It was found that sunglasses had a greater impact on sensitivity to face identity compared to face masks. Both disguises increased the tendency to report faces as familiar, but this bias was absent for full faces. The results also showed that congruence between the type of disguise used during study and test was crucial for memory retrieval.