4.7 Article

Total orders of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: Definitions, generations and applications

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 142-154

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.06.005

Keywords

Group decision making; Total order; Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set; Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic ordered weighted averaging operator

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61273209, 71571123]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [YBJJ1528]
  3. Scientific Innovation Research of College Graduates in Jiangsu Province [KYLX15-0191]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (EHFLTSs) are helpful to model uncertain linguistic information in qualitative group decision making (QGDM). Total orders are essential whenever more than two EHFLTSs have to be compared, such as aggregating them by the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator. However, the existing studies only focus on partial orders of EHFLTSs and thus their application may be limited. The main purpose of this paper is to develop total orders of EHFLTSs. A constructive approach is proposed to generate total orders by aggregation functions. Three distinct total orders are defined for potential applications as well. To clarify the importance of total orders in QGDM, the extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic OWA operator is developed and some properties are demonstrated;Finally, based on the proposed techniques and the social choice theory, an approach formed by two algorithms is presented to solve the QGDM problems in which some necessary parameters, e.g. risk preferences, are complicated to determine. The proposed total order resolves one current challenge of EHFLTSs and thus can serve as a foundation of decision making with EHFLTSs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available