4.7 Article

Estimation of interface frictional anisotropy between sand and snakeskin-inspired surfaces

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31047-3

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a modified direct shear apparatus was used to conduct 45 different shear tests in various directions and under different vertical stresses. The results show that shearing against the scales (cranial shearing) mobilizes higher shear resistance and produces a dilative response compared to shearing along the scales (caudal shearing). Additionally, higher scale height or shorter scale length is associated with increased interface friction angle.
The transmission of loads across the soil-structure mobilizes direction-dependent shear resistance, which can be selectively used to design geo-structures. A previous study confirmed the frictional anisotropy induced by the interface between the soil and snakeskin-inspired surfaces. However, it is necessary to estimate the interface friction angle quantitatively. In this study, a conventional direct shear apparatus is modified, and 45 cases are performed in two-way shearing directions between bio-inspired surfaces and Jumunjin standard sand under three vertical stresses (50, 100, and 200 kPa). The results show that: (1) shearing against the scales (cranial shearing) mobilizes larger shear resistance and produces a dilative response than shearing along the scales (caudal shearing) and (2) higher scale height or shorter scale length exhibits dilative tendency and produces higher interface friction angle. Further analysis is conducted to capture the frictional anisotropy as a function of the scale geometry ratio, which reveals that the interface anisotropy response is more pronounced during cranial shearing in all the cases, and the difference in the interface friction angle for the caudal -> cranial test is higher than that for the cranial -> caudal test at the given scale ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available