4.7 Article

Applying novel economic simple green sample preparation procedures on natural and industrial specimens for chromatographic determination of insecticidal residues

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33421-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spraying a tertiary blend of insecticides on tomato fruits is common in agriculture-attentive countries. A simple green sample preparation technique was developed and applied to field samples. HP-TLC and RP-HPLC methods were established to estimate the residual insecticides and applied to prepared field specimens.
Spraying a tertiary blend of the insecticides (hexythiazox, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam), on tomato fruits, is a routine in agriculture-attentive countries. A simple green sample preparation technique was developed and applied to the field samples. Specific HP-TLC and RP-HPLC methodologies are established to estimate the residual insecticides and applied to the prepared field specimens. In the planner chromatographic methodology, methanol:chloroform:glacial acetic acid:triethyl amine (8.5:1.5:0.2:0.1, v/v) is recommended as a mobile system. The other one is columnar chromatography; acetonitrile: water (20:80, v/v), pH 2.8, is recommended as a mobile system. The validation parameters were examined following the ICH rules. The means percentages and standard deviations of the accuracy of the HP-TLC method for the determined compounds were 99.66 +/- 0.974, 99.41 +/- 0.950, and 99.89 +/- 0.983, correspondingly. The values were 99.24 +/- 0.921, 99.69 +/- 0.681, and 99.20 +/- 0.692, correspondingly, when they were determined by the RP-HPLC method. The relative standard deviation percentages of the methods' repeatability and intermediate precision ranged from 0.389 to 0.920. Both methods were highly specific having resolution factors of >= 1.78 and selectivity factors of >= 1.71. They were applied to the field samples perfectly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available