4.7 Article

Comparative Assessment of the Nutritional Profile of Meat Products and Their Plant-Based Analogues

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15122807

Keywords

plant-based meat analogues; nutrient profile; ingredients; nutrition labeling; plant-based protein; food labeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vegetarian and vegan diets are on the rise in Spain, driven by ethical concerns for animal welfare and the environment. This has led to a growing market for plant-based meat substitutes. However, limited data is available on the nutritional value of these analogues in Mediterranean countries.
Vegetarian and vegan diets are increasingly being adopted in Spain, a trend mainly driven by ethical concerns for animal welfare and the environment. This has resulted in a growing market for plant-based substitutes of meat products. However, available data on the nutritional value of such meat analogues in Mediterranean countries are still limited. In this study, the labelling information of four categories of plant-based meat analogues (n = 100) and the corresponding conventional meat products (n = 48) available on the Spanish market was surveyed and compared. The nutrient content of plant-based meat analogues varied significantly, due to the wide range of ingredients used in their formulation. Some of these products were found to have a low protein content, which in others was enhanced by the addition of cereals and legumes. Compared to the meat products, the plant-based analogues contained lower levels of total fat as well as saturated fat, which ranged from 30% of total fat in burgers to less than 15% in meatballs, sausages, and nuggets; in contrast, they contained higher amounts of fiber and complex carbohydrates. Overall, the meat analogues cannot be considered as nutritionally equivalent substitutes to conventional meat products due to a high variability of protein content and other nutrients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available