4.6 Article

Modelling of Catalytic Combustion in a Deformable Porous Burner Using a Fluid-Solid Interaction (FSI) Framework

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16052093

Keywords

Ni3Al; micro combustion; catalytic combustion; surface mass; fluid-solid interaction (FSI); two-field momentum; three-fields temperature model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents and discusses the various concepts involved in the mathematical modeling of fluid-solid interactions in the catalytic combustion processes occurring within a porous burner. It addresses the relevant physical and chemical phenomena, compares mathematical models, proposes a hybrid two/three-field model, estimates the interphase transfer coefficients, discusses proper constitutive equations and closure relations, and generalizes the Terzaghi concept of stresses. Selected examples of model application are presented and described. Finally, a numerical verification example is used to demonstrate the application of the proposed model.
The various concepts involved in the mathematical modeling of the fluid-solid interactions (FSIs) of catalytic combustion processes occurring within a porous burner are presented and discussed in this paper. The following aspects of them are addressed: (a) the relevant physical and chemical phenomena appearing at the interface between the gas and the catalytic surface; (b) a comparison of mathematical models; (c) a proposal of a hybrid two/three-field model, (d) an estimation of the interphase transfer coefficients; (e) a discussion of the proper constitutive equations and the closure relations; and (f) a generalization of the Terzaghi concept of stresses. Selected examples of application of the models are then presented and described. Finally, a numerical verification example is presented and discussed to demonstrate the application of the proposed model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available