4.6 Article

Particle and Phase Analysis of Combusted Iron Particles for Energy Storage and Release

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16052009

Keywords

particle characterization; metal fuels; iron combustion; nanoparticles; microexplosions; small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS); wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of different fuel-air equivalence ratios on particle morphology, size and degree of oxidation in an iron-air model burner is investigated. It is found that leaner combustion conditions lead to smaller particle size and higher degree of oxidation. Additionally, choosing a suitable particle size range can minimize residual iron content.
The combustion of metal fuels as energy carriers in a closed-cycle carbon-free process is a promising approach for reducing CO2 emissions in the energy sector. For a possible large-scale implementation, the influence of process conditions on particle properties and vice versa has to be well understood. In this study, the influence of different fuel-air equivalence ratios on particle morphology, size and degree of oxidation in an iron-air model burner is investigated by means of small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering, laser diffraction analysis and electron microscopy. The results show a decrease in median particle size and an increase in the degree of oxidation for leaner combustion conditions. The difference of 1.94 mu m in median particle size between lean and rich conditions is twentyfold greater than the expected amount and can be connected to an increased intensity of microexplosions and nanoparticle formation for oxygen-rich atmospheres. Furthermore, the influence of the process conditions on the fuel usage efficiency is investigated, yielding efficiencies of up to 0.93. Furthermore, by choosing a suitable particle size range of 1 to 10 mu m, the amount of residual iron content can be minimized. The results emphasize that particle size plays a key role in optimizing this process for the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available