4.6 Article

Cavitation Erosion Characteristics of the EN AW-6082 Aluminum Alloy by TIG Surface Remelting

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16072563

Keywords

TIG remelting; aluminum alloy; cavitation erosion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effect of surface re-melting on the reduction of material loss through cavitation erosion in aluminum alloys. The results show that surface re-melting treatment can increase microhardness and decrease erosion rate.
Components made of aluminum alloys operating under cavitation erosion conditions have low performance and therefore a reduced lifetime. The degradation of these components is a consequence of the repetitive implosion of cavitation bubbles adjacent to the solid surface. In this paper, the effect of the rapid re-melting and solidification modification of the surface microstructure of parts of an Al-based alloy strengthened by artificial ageing on the reduction of material loss through cavitation erosion was investigated. The heat source used was the electric arc generated between a tungsten electrode and the workpiece (i.e., TIG). Local surface melting was performed at different values of linear energy (El = 6600-15840 J/cm), varying the current between 100 A and 200 A, at a constant voltage of 10 V. The obtained results showed an increase in the surface microhardness at values of 129-137 HV0.05 and a decrease in the erosion rate from 0.50 mu m/min, characteristic of the artificial ageing heat treatment, to 0.10-0.32 mu m/min, specific to TIG re-melted layers. For the study of the cavitational erosion mechanism, investigations were carried out by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that the improvement of the cavitational erosion resistance by surface melting was a consequence of the increase in microstructural homogeneity and grains refinement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available