4.6 Article

Influence of Sintering Conditions and Nanosilicon Carbide Concentration on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Si3N4-Based Materials

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16052079

Keywords

fracture toughness; hardness; hot isostatic pressing; silicon carbide nanopowder; silicon nitride; thermal conductivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the thermal and mechanical properties of silicon nitride ceramics reinforced by nano silicon carbide particles. The presence of carbide phase led to an increase in thermal conductivity, but a decrease in densification efficiency and overall performance. The use of hot isostatic press (HIP) for sintering was beneficial in terms of mechanical properties.
In the work, silicon nitride ceramics (Si3N4) and silicon nitride reinforced by nano silicon carbide particles (Si3N4-nSiC) in amounts of 1-10 wt.% were investigated. The materials were obtained using two sintering regimes: under conditions of ambient and high isostatic pressure. The influence of the sintering conditions and the concentration of nanosilicon carbide particles on the thermal and mechanical properties was studied. The presence of highly conductive silicon carbide particles caused an increase in thermal conductivity only in the case of the composites containing 1 wt.% of the carbide phase (15.6 W center dot m(-1)center dot K-1) in comparison with silicon nitride ceramics (11.4 W center dot m(-1)center dot K-1) obtained under the same conditions. With the increase in the carbide phase, a decrease in the densification efficiency during sintering was observed, which caused a decrease in thermal and mechanical performance. The sintering performed using a hot isostatic press (HIP) proved to be beneficial in terms of mechanical properties. The one-step high-pressure assisted sintering process in the HIP minimizes the formation of defects at the sample surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available