4.6 Article

High-Temperature Oxidation Behaviour of CrSi Coatings on 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16093533

Keywords

CrSi coatings; magnetron sputtering; oxidation; 316 stainless steel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a closed-field unbalanced magnetron sputtering system was used to deposit CrSi coatings on 316 austenitic stainless steel. The oxidation behavior of the coatings at elevated temperatures was investigated and the optimized coating for stainless steel protection was identified. It was found that a small amount of Si in Cr coatings effectively protected the stainless steel, while a high Si content made the coating more brittle and prone to damage at high temperatures.
In this study, a closed-field unbalanced magnetron sputtering system, which is environmentally friendly and has high deposition efficiency, was used to deposit CrSi coatings on 316 austenitic stainless steel. This system utilised separate Cr and Si targets, and the appropriate content of Cr and Si of the coatings was adjusted by changing the currents applied to the targets. A series of CrSi coatings with different Si/Cr ratios were produced, and their oxidation behaviour at elevated temperatures was investigated. By analysing the weight gain, surface morphology and microstructure, composition and phase constituents, the oxidation behaviour at 600 degrees C, 700 degrees C and 800 degrees C was investigated and the optimized coating to protect the stainless steel has been identified. The outcome of the research indicated that a small amount of Si (between 4-7 at.%) in Cr coatings is effective in protecting the austenitic stainless steel against oxidation at high temperatures, while a high Si content (around 10 at.% or more) makes the coating more brittle and prone to cracking or delamination during oxidation at 800 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available