4.5 Article

Interpretation of Misarticulated Words by Children With and Without Speech Sound Disorders

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages 1137-1147

Publisher

AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC
DOI: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00474

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to examine word interpretation of misarticulated words by children with speech sound disorders (SSDs). The findings indicate that children with SSD are more likely to associate common misarticulated words with pictured objects.
Purpose: Children with speech sound disorders (SSDs) often struggle with forming early representations for phonemes and words, which could impact their speech production as well as their lexical access. This difficulty may limit their ability to accurately identify nonexemplar productions of words, such as developmental misarticulations produced by peers. The purpose of this study was to examine word interpretation of misarticulated words by children with SSD.Method: Seventeen monolingual English-speaking preschoolers were assessed for language, phonological processing, and articulation skills. Participants heard three types of words: accurate productions (e.g., leaf), common misarticulated productions (e.g., weaf), uncommon misarticulated productions (e.g., yeaf), and unrelated nonwords (e.g., gim). Children were presented with these words aurally and asked to select the picture that matched what they heard-either a real object or a blank square.Results: The proportion of real object picture selections was calculated for each word type and compared within subjects. The findings indicate that children with SSD reliably associated common misarticulated words with pictured objects more frequently than they did in the uncommon misarticulation condition. These results were compared between subjects to typically developing (TD) peers' responses using a one-way analysis of variance. The results indicate that children with SSD identified common substitutions as real object pictures more often than TD peers.Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that children with SSD are sensitive to the commonness of misarticulations; however, they accept common substitutions as real object pictures significantly more often than TD peers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available