4.7 Review

Toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages 1753-1768

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000368

Keywords

immune checkpoint inhibitors; immunotherapy; PD-1; PD-L1 inhibitors; randomized controlled trial; systematic review; toxicity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review investigated the susceptibility of cancer patients to toxicities associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and established a clinically relevant landscape of side effects of these inhibitors. The study found that patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had lower risks for gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities, but higher risks for respiratory toxicities. In terms of specific side effects, patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had lower risks for fatigue, asthenia, and peripheral edema, but higher risks for pyrexia, cough, dyspnea, pneumonitis, and pruritus.
Background:Available evidence shows that the incidence of toxicities associated with cancer immunotherapy, such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)-related toxicities, is estimated to be between 0.3 and 1.3%. Objective:This systematic review aimed to investigate cancer patients' susceptibility to toxicities associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and establish a clinically relevant landscape of side effects of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Data sources:Relevant publications from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) between 2014 and 2019. Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions:We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting treatment-related toxicities associated with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of cancers. The primary endpoint was to assess the difference in the incidences of toxicities between cancer patients who did and did not receive PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. A total of 29 RCTs, incorporating 8576 patients, met the eligibility criteria. Study appraisal and synthesis methods:We calculated the pooled relative risks and corresponding 95% CIs using a random-effects model and assessed the heterogeneity between different groups. The subgroup analyses were conducted based on cancer type, toxicity grade (severity), system and organ, treatment regimens in the intervention arm and the control arm, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor drug type, and cancer type. Results:A total of 11 categories (e.g. endocrine toxicity), and 39 toxicity types (e.g. hyperthyroidism) were identified. For toxicities at any grade, those treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were at lower risks for gastrointestinal toxicity, hematologic toxicity, and treatment event leading to discontinuation; and were at higher risks for respiratory toxicity (all P<0.05). Those treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were at lower risks for fatigue, asthenia, and peripheral edema and were at higher risks for pyrexia, cough, dyspnea, pneumonitis, and pruritus. Limitations:The present research is a meta-analysis at the study level rather than at the patient level; insights on risk factors associated with the development of toxicities cannot be found in our study. There was a possible overlap in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) definitions which prevents understanding the true rates of specific toxicities. Conclusions and implications of key findings:For most toxicity types based on system and organ, the incidence proportions for patients in the intervention arm were lower than those in the control arm, which suggested the general safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors against conventional chemotherapy and cytotoxic t-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors. Future research should focus on taking effective targeted measures to decrease the risks of different toxicities for different patient populations. Systematic review registration number:We registered the research protocol with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42019135113).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available