4.7 Article

Multi-Use Trust in Crowdsourced IoT Services

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 1268-1281

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TSC.2022.3160469

Keywords

Internet of Things; Wireless fidelity; Crowdsourcing; Security; Videos; Trust management; Reliability; IoT services; trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces the concept of adaptive trust in crowdsourced IoT services, which is a customized fine-grained trust tailored for specific IoT consumers. Usage patterns of IoT consumers are exploited to provide an accurate trust value for service providers. A novel adaptive trust management framework is proposed to assess the dynamic trust of IoT services. The framework leverages a novel detection algorithm to obtain trust indicators that are likely to influence the trust level of a specific IoT service type.
We introduce the concept of adaptive trust in crowdsourced IoT services. It is a customized fine-grained trust tailored for specific IoT consumers. Usage patterns of IoT consumers are exploited to provide an accurate trust value for service providers. A novel adaptive trust management framework is proposed to assess the dynamic trust of IoT services. The framework leverages a novel detection algorithm to obtain trust indicators that are likely to influence the trust level of a specific IoT service type. Detected trust indicators are then used to build service-to-indicator model to evaluate a service's trust at each indicator. Similarly, a usage-to-indicator model is built to obtain the importance of each trust indicator for a particular usage scenario. The per-indicator trust and the importance of each trust indicator are utilized to obtain an overall value of a given service for a specific consumer. We conduct a set of experiments on a real dataset to show the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available