4.6 Article

Interpretations of the cosmic ray secondary-to-primary ratios measured by DAMPE

Journal

FRONTIERS OF PHYSICS
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11467-023-1257-7

Keywords

cosmic rays; propagation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The measurements by DAMPE reveal hardenings in the boron-to-carbon and boron-to-oxygen ratios around 100 GeV/n, indicating the influence of turbulence on cosmic ray propagation and acceleration. These findings have significant implications for our understanding of Galactic cosmic rays. Various models proposed in literature are examined in light of these results, but some fail to reproduce the observed hardenings in the ratios.
Precise measurements of the boron-to-carbon and boron-to-oxygen ratios by DAMPE show clear hardenings around 100 GeV/n, which provide important implications on the production, propagation, and interaction of Galactic cosmic rays. In this work we investigate a number of models proposed in literature in light of the DAMPE findings. These models can roughly be classified into two classes, driven by propagation effects or by source ones. Among these models discussed, we find that the re-acceleration of cosmic rays, during their propagation, by random magnetohydrodynamic waves may not reproduce sufficient hardenings of B/C and B/O, and an additional spectral break of the diffusion coefficient is required. The other models can properly explain the hardenings of the ratios. However, depending on simplifications assumed, the models differ in their quality in reproducing the data in a wide energy range. The models with significant re-acceleration effect will under-predict low-energy antiprotons but over-predict low-energy positrons, and the models with secondary production at sources over-predict high-energy antiprotons. For all models high-energy positron excess exists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available