4.5 Article

Thin-shell wormhole under non-commutative geometry inspired Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03764-1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity is a generalization of general relativity to higher dimensions. By using the "Cut-Paste" technique from black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and inspired by non-commutative geometry, a new class of 5D thin-shell wormholes has been constructed, with a static spherically symmetric, Gaussian mass distribution as the source. The study explores the pressure-density profile, equation of state, nature of the wormhole, and the total amount of exotic matter content at the shell, as well as analyzes the linearized stability of the constructed wormhole. The findings suggest that the model is plausible compared to other thin-shell wormhole models in literature.
Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity is a generalization of the general relativity to higher dimensions in which the first- and second-order terms correspond to general relativity and Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, respectively. We construct a new class of five-dimensional (5D) thin-shell wormholes by the 'Cut-Paste' technique from black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity inspired by non-commutative geometry starting with a static spherically symmetric, Gaussian mass distribution as a source and for this structural form of the thin-shell wormhole we have explored several salient features of the solution, viz., pressure-density profile, equation of state, the nature of wormhole, total amount of exotic matter content at the shell. We have also analyzed the linearized stability of the constructed wormhole. From our study we can assert that our model is found to be plausible with reference to the other model of thin-shell wormhole available in literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available