4.6 Article

Quantifying spatiotemporal variability in occupant exposure to an indoor airborne contaminant with an uncertain source location

Journal

BUILDING SIMULATION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12273-022-0971-3

Keywords

uncertainty; variability; airborne contaminant; spatiotemporal variability; well-mixed; heterogeneity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a quantitative method for estimating the spatiotemporal variability of a room is proposed, based on influential room parameters. After simulating contaminant dispersion for different source locations, it was found that the standard deviation in the spatial distribution of exposure during the releasing period was approximately 28% of the source average exposure, while the variability in different average exposures was lower, only 10% of the total average. The results demonstrate that systematically characterizing a room's average concentration, its variability, and the spatial variability within the room can provide important insights into the uncertainty in occupant exposures relative to well-mixed models.
Well-mixed zone models are often employed to compute indoor air quality and occupant exposures. While effective, a potential downside to assuming instantaneous, perfect mixing is underpredicting exposures to high intermittent concentrations within a room. When such cases are of concern, more spatially resolved models, like computational-fluid dynamics methods, are used for some or all of the zones. But, these models have higher computational costs and require more input information. A preferred compromise would be to continue with a multi-zone modeling approach for all rooms, but with a better assessment of the spatial variability within a room. To do so, we present a quantitative method for estimating a room's spatiotemporal variability, based on influential room parameters. Our proposed method disaggregates variability into the variability in a room's average concentration, and the spatial variability within the room relative to that average. This enables a detailed assessment of how variability in particular room parameters impacts the uncertain occupant exposures. To demonstrate the utility of this method, we simulate contaminant dispersion for a variety of possible source locations. We compute breathing-zone exposure during the releasing (source is active) and decaying (source is removed) periods. Using CFD methods, we found after a 30 minutes release the average standard deviation in the spatial distribution of exposure was approximately 28% of the source average exposure, whereas variability in the different average exposures was lower, only 10% of the total average. We also find that although uncertainty in the source location leads to variability in the average magnitude of transient exposure, it does not have a particularly large influence on the spatial distribution during the decaying period, or on the average contaminant removal rate. By systematically characterizing a room's average concentration, its variability, and the spatial variability within the room important insights can be gained as to how much uncertainty is introduced into occupant exposure predictions by assuming a uniform in-room contaminant concentration. We discuss how the results of these characterizations can improve our understanding of the uncertainty in occupant exposures relative to well-mixed models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available