4.3 Article

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) positively correlates with the presence and severity of metabolic syndrome in obese adults, but not in obese children/adolescents

Journal

BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12902-023-01369-4

Keywords

Obesity; Metabolic syndrome; Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; Adults; Children; adolescents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates the usefulness of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in evaluating metabolic syndrome (MetS) in obese individuals. The prevalence of MetS is higher in adults compared to children/adolescents, and NLR values are positively correlated with MetS severity in adults but not in pediatric subjects.
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) associated with obesity is a pathological condition increasing worldwide. Recent studies have demonstrated that the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can be successfully used to stage MetS in obese adults. The aim of the study was to evaluate NLR values in 552 children/adolescents (M 219, F 333; 14.8 [12.9-16.3] years) and 231 adults (M 88, F 143; 52.3 [36.4-63.3] years) with morbid obesity, subdivided into subgroups according with the presence or absence of MetS. Adult patients with obesity showed a higher prevalence of MetS compared to the pediatric population (71% vs 26%), associated with a greater number of subjects with 3 and 4-5 altered components for MetS. NLR was higher (P-value = 0.041) in adults with MetS compared with those without. NLR values also positively correlated with the severity grade of the syndrome (P-value = 0.032). By contrast, in pediatric subjects with obesity with MetS, NLR values were comparable with those recorded in subjects without MetS (P-value = 0.861), no correlation being found with MetS severity (P-value = 0.441). Our study confirms the importance of NLR as an inflammatory indicator associated with MetS in adult subjects with severe obesity, while it excludes a similar role in children/adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available