4.7 Review

Screening for muscle wasting and dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 53-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.02.025

Keywords

frailty; muscle function; muscle mass; sarcopenia; strength

Funding

  1. Stockholm County Council
  2. Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation
  3. Westman Foundation
  4. National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health
  5. Karolinska Institutet Diabetes Centre
  6. Swedish Medical Research Council
  7. Westmans Foundation
  8. National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)
  9. Oswaldo Ramos Foundation
  10. Baxter Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skeletal muscle mass and muscle function are negatively affected by a variety of conditions inherent to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and to dialysis treatment. Skeletal muscle mass and function serve as indicators of the nutritional and clinical state of CKD patients, and low values or derangements over time are strong predictors of poor patient outcomes. However, muscle size and function can be affected by different factors, may decline at different rates, and may have different patient implications. Therefore, operational definitions of frailty and sarcopenia have emerged to encompass these 2 dimensions of muscle health, i.e., size and functionality. The aim of this review is to appraise available methods for assessment of muscle mass and functionality, with an emphasis on their accuracy in the setting of CKD patients. We then discuss the selection of reference cutoffs for defining conditions of muscle wasting and dysfunction. Finally, we review definitions applied in studies addressing sarcopenia and frailty in CKD patients and discuss their applicability for diagnosis and monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available