4.8 Review

Status and Prospects of MXene-Based Lithium-Oxygen Batteries: Theoretical Prediction and Experimental Modulation

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202204019

Keywords

electrocatalysts; Li-O-2 batteries; MXene-based materials; structure modulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper summarizes the latest research progress in MXene-based materials in LOBs, highlighting the significance of high conductivity and surface functionalization strategies in the theoretical design and experimental modulation, which promote electrode reaction kinetics and cyclability of LOBs. It also outlines the prospects and challenges of MXene-based LOBs and proposes novel strategies to enhance battery performance, inspiring future progress in designing high-performance LOBs using MXene materials.
The consumption of fossil fuels has contributed to global warming and other problems. It is urgent to exploit progressive, low-cost, and environmentally friendly energy storage devices with super high energy density. Rechargeable lithium oxygen batteries (LOBs) with a high theoretical energy density (approximate to 11400 Wh kg(-1)) are one of the most promising chemical power supplies. MXenes have recently emerged in energy storage and conversion due to their superior conductivity and adjustable structural properties. Here, this paper summarizes the latest research progress in MXene-based materials in the cathode, anode, separator and electrolyte of LOBs and emphasizes the significance of high conductivity and surface functionalization strategies in the theoretical design and experimental modulation, which promote electrode reaction kinetics and increase the cyclability of LOBs. It also summarizes the prospects and challenges of MXene-based LOBs and proposes novel strategies to promote battery performance, inspiring the future progress of MXene-based materials in designing high-performance LOBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available