4.8 Article

Enantiodivergent Photochemical Rearrangements Due to Different Coordination Modes at an Oxazaborolidine Lewis Acid Catalyst

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages 5896-5905

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.3c00639

Keywords

photochemistry; Lewis acid catalysis; enantiodivergence; rearrangements; oxazaborolidines; DFT computations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A strong enantiodivergence was observed in the oxadi-x-methane rearrangement of 2,4cyclohexadienones, ranging from +92% ee to -45% ee. The stereochemical outcome is determined solely by the oxazaborolidine substituents. The change in enantioselectivity is linked to a change in substrate binding, and TDDFT studies in the S1 excited state provided further mechanistic insights.
A strong enantiodivergence ranging from +92% ee to -45% ee was observed in the oxadi-x-methane rearrangement of 2,4cyclohexadienones. Oxazaborolidine-based Lewis acid catalysts of the same absolute configuration were applied in all cases, and the stereochemical outcome is solely a function of the oxazaborolidine substituents. Based on the results of an extended catalyst library screening (27 examples) and by interrogating plausible catalyst- substrate complexes in the ground state with density functional theory (DFT) methods, we could link the switch in enantioselectivity to a change in substrate binding. If the typical substrate binding at the convex catalyst side is inhibited by bulky substituents, our results indicate that substrates instead bind to the concave side, and enantiomeric products result. Studies by TDDFT in the S1 excited state further clarified the mechanistic picture by connecting efficient product formation with trajectories that reach a conical intersection with more excess energy. Our analysis was validated by the stereochemical outcome achieved with five structurally different catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available