4.8 Article

A spectral method for assessing and combining multiple data visualizations

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36492-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dimension reduction is crucial in modern data science, and this paper introduces a spectral method to evaluate and combine multiple dimension reduction visualizations produced by different algorithms. The proposed method provides a quantitative measure of the relative performance of visualizations and generates a consensus visualization with improved quality.
Dimension reduction is an indispensable part of modern data science, and many algorithms have been developed. Here, the authors develop a theoretically justified, simple to use and reliable spectral method to assess and combine multiple dimension reduction visualizations of a given dataset from diverse algorithms. Dimension reduction is an indispensable part of modern data science, and many algorithms have been developed. However, different algorithms have their own strengths and weaknesses, making it important to evaluate their relative performance, and to leverage and combine their individual strengths. This paper proposes a spectral method for assessing and combining multiple visualizations of a given dataset produced by diverse algorithms. The proposed method provides a quantitative measure - the visualization eigenscore - of the relative performance of the visualizations for preserving the structure around each data point. It also generates a consensus visualization, having improved quality over individual visualizations in capturing the underlying structure. Our approach is flexible and works as a wrapper around any visualizations. We analyze multiple real-world datasets to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method. We also provide theoretical justifications based on a general statistical framework, yielding several fundamental principles along with practical guidance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available