4.8 Article

Unequivocal identification of two-bond heteronuclear correlations in natural products at nanomole scale by i-HMBC

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37289-z

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors developed a practical iHMBC methodology using accurate isotope shift measurement to distinguish two-bond from long-range HMBC correlation. iHMBC can be used as a complement to conventional 2D NMR experiments for determining multiple bond heteronuclear correlations in small to medium-sized organic molecules.
The inability to distinguish two-bond from long-range HMBC correlation has historically impeded NMR structure elucidation. Here the authors developed a practical iHMBC methodology utilizing accurate isotope shift measurement to overcome this limitation. HMBC is an essential NMR experiment for determining multiple bond heteronuclear correlations in small to medium-sized organic molecules, including natural products, yet its major limitation is the inability to differentiate two-bond from longer-range correlations. There have been several attempts to address this issue, but all reported approaches suffer various drawbacks, such as restricted utility and poor sensitivity. Here we present a sensitive and universal methodology to identify two-bond HMBC correlations using isotope shifts, referred to as i-HMBC (isotope shift detection HMBC). Experimental utility was demonstrated at the sub-milligram / nanomole scale with only a few hours of acquisition time required for structure elucidation of several complex proton-deficient natural products, which could not be fully elucidated by conventional 2D NMR experiments. Because i-HMBC overcomes the key limitation of HMBC without significant reduction in sensitivity or performance, i-HMBC can be used as a complement to HMBC when unambiguous identifications of two-bond correlations are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available