4.7 Article

Development and validation of a prognostic index for allograft outcome in kidney recipients with transplant glomerulopathy

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages 450-458

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2015.288

Keywords

antibody-mediated rejection; kidney allograft biopsy; kidney transplant outcome; prognostic index; transplant glomerulopathy

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [K08-DK087824]
  2. American Society of Transplantation (Faculty Development Grant Award)
  3. National Institutes of Health (Clinical and Translational Science Center Award) [UL1TR000457]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied 92 patients with transplant glomerulopathy to develop a prognostic index based on the risk factors for allograft failure within five years of diagnosis (Development cohort). During 60 months (median) follow-up, 64 patients developed allograft failure. A chronic-inflammation score generated by combining Banff ci, ct and ti scores, serum creatinine and proteinuria at biopsy, were independent risk factors for allograft failure. Based on the Cox model, we developed a prognostic index and classified patients into risk groups. Compared to the low-risk group (median allograft survival over 60 months from diagnosis), patients in the medium risk group had a hazard ratio of 2.83 (median survival 25 months), while those in the high-risk group had a hazard ratio of 5.96 (median survival 3.7 months). We next evaluated the performance of the prognostic index in an independent external cohort of 47 patients with transplant glomerulopathy (Validation cohort). The hazard ratios were 2.18 (median survival 19 months) and 16.27 (median survival 1.6 months), respectively, for patients in the medium and high-risk groups, compared to the low-risk group (median survival 47 months). Our prognostic index model did well in measures of discrimination and calibration. Thus, risk stratification of transplant glomerulopathy based on our prognostic index may provide informative insight for both the patient and physician regarding prognosis and treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available