4.5 Review

Intracranial Germinomas: Diagnosis, Pathogenesis, Clinical Presentation, and Management

Journal

CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 765-775

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01416-2

Keywords

Germinoma; Biomarkers; Prognosis; Outcome; Radiotherapy; Chemotherapy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the epidemiology, histopathology with molecular biology, clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, and current treatment strategies with related clinical outcomes of intracranial germinomas. The findings suggest that intracranial germinomas respond well to radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of both, and have very high cure and survival rates. Early discrimination of germinomas from other intracranial neoplasms contributes to the reduction of morbidity and mortality.
Purpose of ReviewIntracranial germinomas constitute a rare brain tumor entity of unknown etiology, characterized by unique histopathology and molecular biology. In this manuscript, we review the literature focusing on the epidemiology, histopathology with molecular biology, clinical presentation with emphasis on tumor location, diagnostic workup, and current treatment strategies with related clinical outcomes of intracranial germinomas.Recent FindingsAlthough the optimal treatment strategy remains a matter of debate, intracranial germinomas respond well to radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of both and are characterized by very high cure and survival rates. It is well-known that early discrimination of germinomas from other intracranial neoplasms facilitates the timely initiation of appropriate treatment, thereby contributing to the reduction of morbidity as well as mortality.Ongoing research will need to be directed towards discovering and refining reliable parameters for early diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis in patients with intracranial germinomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available