4.5 Article

Development and implementation of a decision aid for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction for Japanese women with breast cancer: a field-testing study

Journal

BREAST CANCER
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 570-576

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-023-01447-4

Keywords

Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR); Shared decision-making; Decision-making; Decision aid; Questionnaire

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A Japanese study found that using a decision aid can facilitate shared decision-making and reduce regret over the decision to undergo breast reconstruction surgery. The results showed that patients who used the decision aid had higher scores on the shared decision-making questionnaire and lower regret scores after the decision.
IntroductionSurgical options for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) have increased and become more diverse. These options may cause difficulty and stress for patients in making the best choice, and this also increases the likelihood of postoperative regret over a particular decision. To solve this issue, implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) using a decision aid (DA) has become of increasing interest. We have created the first prototype DA in Japan. The aim of the current field study was to assess the usability of this DA in promoting effective SDM and avoiding regret over a decision to undergo reconstructive surgery.MethodsA total of 25 consecutive patients who underwent BR were enrolled in the study, including 13 with SDM using the decision aid (DA + group) and 12 who received standard information (DA- group) before their choice of surgery. The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) were completed after PMBR, whereas SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) was completed before PMBR. Descriptive and summary statistics were compared to identify differences between the two groups to assess the usability of the DA.ResultsThe DA + group had significantly higher mean total scores on the SDM-Q-9 (90.2 +/- 5.3 vs. 84.1 +/- 3.5, P = 0.0034) and DRS (90.3 +/- 3.8 vs. 84.3 +/- 6.7, P = 0.023), compared to those in the DA- group.ConclusionUse of the DA may cause patients to have a higher level of perceived SDM and less regret, which suggests that the DA helps to facilitate smooth and effective implementation of SDM. We conclude that this type of decision-making approach should be recommended for choice of surgery for PMBR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available