4.5 Article

Improvement of lattice Boltzmann methods based on gated recurrent unit neural network

Journal

SIGNAL IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 3283-3291

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-023-02543-w

Keywords

Lattice Boltzmann method; CG-LBM network; Computational fluid; Gated recurrent unit neural network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces an improved lattice Boltzmann method based on deep learning, which combines convolutional neural network (CNN) and gated recurrent unit neural network (GRU) to significantly reduce computation time and improve computational efficiency. The proposed method also deals with non-stationary and steady-state problems.
Compared with traditional computational fluid dynamics methods, the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) has the advantages of simple program structure, adaptability to complex boundaries, and easy parallel computation. However, since LBM is an explicit algorithm, there are many iterations in the computation process, which leads to an increase in computation time. In this paper, we improve LBM based on deep learning by combining a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a gated recurrent unit neural network (GRU). Based on previous test data, the CNN module extracts spatial features during the computation, while the GRU processes the corresponding temporal features. Compared with the conventional LBM, this method can significantly reduce the computation time and improve the computational efficiency with guaranteed low Reynolds numbers of 1000 and 2000. At the high Reynolds number of 4000, the prediction error of the proposed method is increasing but still has a better performance. In order to verify the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed algorithm, an eddying model widely used in the computational fluid field is developed. The proposed method not only has impressive results but also deals with non-stationary processes and steady-state problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available