4.6 Article

SARS-CoV-2 Is More Efficient than HCoV-NL63 in Infecting a Small Subpopulation of ACE2+Human Respiratory Epithelial Cells

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v15030736

Keywords

ACE2; Alphacoronavirus; Betacoronavirus; COVID-19; human respiratory epithelial cells; HCoV-NL63; SARS-CoV-2

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HCoV-NL63 is a major cause of respiratory tract infections in children, while SARS-CoV-2 can cause more severe respiratory and systemic disease. The study compared the susceptibility, replication dynamics, and morphogenesis of HCoV-NL63 and SARS-CoV-2 in human respiratory epithelial cells. The results showed that SARS-CoV-2 was more efficient than HCoV-NL63 in infecting cells expressing the ACE2 receptors, and replicated more efficiently in the cells.
Human coronavirus (HCoV)-NL63 is an important contributor to upper and lower respiratory tract infections, mainly in children, while severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent of COVID-19, can cause lower respiratory tract infections, and more severe, respiratory and systemic disease, which leads to fatal consequences in many cases. Using microscopy, immunohistochemistry (IHC), virus-binding assay, reverse transcriptase qPCR (RT-qPCR) assay, and flow cytometry, we compared the characteristics of the susceptibility, replication dynamics, and morphogenesis of HCoV-NL63 and SARS-CoV-2 in monolayer cultures of primary human respiratory epithelial cells (HRECs). Less than 10% HRECs expressed ACE2, and SARS-CoV-2 seemed much more efficient than HCoV-NL63 at infecting the very small proportion of HRECs expressing the ACE2 receptors. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 replicated more efficiently than HCoV-NL63 in HREC, which correlates with the cumulative evidence of the differences in their transmissibility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available