4.2 Article

Comparison of skull growth in two ecosystem modifiers: beavers Castor canadensis (Rodentia: Castoridae) and muskrats Ondatra zibethicus (Rodentia: Cricetidae)

Journal

ZOOLOGISCHER ANZEIGER
Volume 304, Issue -, Pages 61-72

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcz.2023.03.004

Keywords

Development; Cranial ontogeny; Invasive mammals; Ecosystem engineer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Beavers and muskrats are invasive semi-aquatic rodents in southern South America, with significant impacts on the ecosystem. Despite sharing some skull morphological characters, they exhibit distinct shape differences in the skulls during ontogeny, attributed to different body sizes and phylogenetic history. Through quantitative analysis of ontogenetic series, we found high differences in the ontogenetic trajectories of the two species, suggesting contrasting muscular, functional, and structural conditions in their skulls. These findings indicate that similar behavioral and ecological specializations can be achieved through distinct patterns of skull development.
Beavers and muskrats are semi-aquatic, generalist herbivorous rodents regarded as invasive in southern South America, with high impacts on the ecosystem. They share some morphological characters of the skull, but different body sizes and phylogenetic history, showing evident shape differences in young and adult skulls during the development in both species. Considering their similar ecological specializations, skull shape could be achieved through different or similar patterns of allometric growth during ontogeny. We analyzed quantitatively the ontogenetic series including 94 specimens of beavers and muskrats and performed multivariate and bivariate analyses considering 20 linear measurements. Our main results from the different approaches suggest high differences in the ontogenetic trajectories of beavers and muskrats, implying disparity in the muscular, func-tional, and structural conditions of the skull of both species. These differences reflect that although skulls might undergo similar mechanical stress, it is possible to reach a cranial morphology compatible with the similar behavioral and ecological specializations between both species from patterns of skull development that are markedly different.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available