4.4 Article

Reassessment of the type locality of Euptychia stigmatica Godman, 1905, with the description of two new sibling species from Amazonia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae, Satyrini)

Journal

ZOOKEYS
Volume -, Issue 1167, Pages 57-88

Publisher

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1167.102979

Keywords

Atlantic Forest; Brazil; Entre Rios; Euptychiina; Herbert Huntingdon Smith; Peru; Rio de Janeiro; taxonomy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A brief historical review of the type locality of Euptychia stigmatica suggests that the actual type locality is Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, not northeastern Argentina. Therefore, E. stigmatica and its senior synonym E. cyanites are considered as two species-group names representing a taxon in the euptychiine genus Caeruleuptychia known from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. A lectotype is designated for E. cyanites. Additionally, two closely related species, Caeruleuptychia harrisi and C. aemulatio, occurring in the Amazonia region are named and described using an integrative approach of morphological and molecular evidence.
A brief historical review regarding the type locality of Euptychia stigmatica Godman, 1905 was conducted, which suggests that its type locality is actually Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, rather than northeastern Argentina, as previously purported. Consequently, E. stigmatica and its senior synonym E. cyanites Butler, 1871, are regarded to be two species-group names representing a taxon in the euptychiine genus Caeruleuptychia Forster, 1964 known from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. A lectotype is designated for E. cyanites. Additionally, two closely related species are named and described using an integrative approach with morphological and molecular evidence. Caeruleuptychia harrisi Nakahara & Freitas, sp. nov. and C. aemulatio Nakahara & Willmott, sp. nov. both occur in Amazonia and COI barcode data recovered these taxa as part of the caerulea clade of Caeruleuptychia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available