4.0 Article

Analysis of Coronado State Historic Site artifacts using X-rays

Journal

X-RAY SPECTROMETRY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/xrs.3350

Keywords

artifacts; Coronado Historic Site; Kuaua Pueblo; New Mexico Historic Sites

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two metal artifacts, a crossbow quarrel and a reliquary pendant, were analyzed using various X-ray techniques as well as infrared spectroscopy and electron microscopy. The metal material was found to be copper, while the gems in the pendant were composed of manganese and calcium.
Two historic-period metal artifacts were provided by the New Mexico Historic Sites to Los Alamos National Laboratory for non-destructive analysis. The artifacts were a crossbow quarrel (or bolthead) and a reliquary pendant recovered from Kuaua Pueblo (also known as the Coronado Historic Site) in Bernalillo, NM. The quarrel is a heavily patinated metal that had been flattened due to compressive forces. The pendant consisted of a metal casing that had previously surrounded two center gemstones on the front and rear face of the pendant. The gemstone in the rear setting had fractured and was displaced from the setting, leaving only a small, loose fragment within the pendant for study. The front gem appeared to be very dark, near-black in color, and the fragment of the rear gem was a bright red color. The artifacts were analyzed to ascertain their composition and glean insight into their provenance using the following X-ray techniques: X-ray computed tomography, confocal micro X-ray fluorescence, and X-ray diffraction. Infrared spectroscopy and electron microscopy were used on selected areas. Ultraviolet Raman spectra were collected on the two gems and the pendant. The metal material of the artifacts was found to be primarily composed of copper. The gems in the pendant were composed of manganese (front gem) and calcium (side gem).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available