4.5 Article

Analysis of security and privacy issues in wearables for minors

Journal

WIRELESS NETWORKS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-022-03211-6

Keywords

Cybersecurity; Internet of things; Minors; Privacy; Wearables

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increased use of wearables in recent years has led to technological advancements in this area. However, without proper supervision, usability may prioritize over security. The collection of personal data by wearables makes them attractive targets for attackers. This study proposes a set of tests to evaluate the security and privacy of wearables, specifically those targeted at minors. Results show that while low-end devices are generally less secure than high-end ones, most wearables have security and privacy flaws, highlighting the need for regulations to ensure appropriate security measures.
The increased use of wearables in recent years has fostered a great technological development in this area, although without the appropriate supervision usability may go first than security. In addition to this, the fact that wearables have been requiring more and more personal data from the user makes them attractive devices for an attacker. In this paper we propose a set of tests for evaluating the security and privacy of wearables and we apply them to analyse the security and privacy of a set of commercial wearables that are targeted at minors, who represent a group with especially high requirements in this regard. We define the testing scenario, expose the tools to support the research, and specify the testing process to be followed. Based on the obtained results, although the considered low-end devices are broadly speaking less secure than high-end ones, most of them present security and privacy flaws, which illustrates the necessity of regulation that ensures the fulfilment of appropriate security and privacy requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available