4.7 Article

Temperature-frequency wear mechanism maps for a heat-resistant austenitic stainless steel

Journal

WEAR
Volume 522, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2023.204844

Keywords

Wear map; Fretting wear; Glaze layer; Severe -to -mild wear transition; Austenitic stainless steel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic experimental investigation is conducted to understand the effect of temperature and cycling frequency on the friction and wear behavior of high-Cr, high-Ni heat-resistant austenitic stainless steel 310S under gross slip fretting wear. The study uses a cylinder-on-flat contact configuration with temperatures ranging from 20°C to 700°C and cycling frequencies ranging from 1 Hz to 50 Hz. The results provide insights into the severe-to-mild wear transition and the establishment of an effective glaze layer protection.
A systematic experimental investigation is used to establish the influence of temperature and cycling frequency on the friction and wear behavior of the high-Cr, high-Ni heat-resistant austenitic stainless steel 310S (25% Cr-20%Ni) under gross slip fretting wear. The contact configuration is cylinder-on-flat using a like-on-like tri-bopair. Temperatures range from 20 degrees C to 700 degrees C and cycling frequencies range from 1 Hz to 50 Hz. A workflow to generate the wear maps with minimal number of tests, namely hierarchical probing and sampling strategy, is used to clearly establish the severe-to-mild wear transition associated with glaze layer formation. The critical temperatures related to this transition along with the number of cycles needed to establish effective glaze layer protection are obtained. A recent model reported in the literature that determines the number of cycles needed to establish effective glaze layer protection at different temperatures and frequencies gives good prediction if the temperature rise at the contact surface due to Coulomb heating is accounted for.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available