4.5 Article

Application of wavelet theory to enhance the performance of machine learning techniques in estimating water quality parameters (case study: Gao-Ping River)

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages 1294-1315

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2023.047

Keywords

ANFIS; ANN; machine learning; water quality; wavelet transform

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modern artificial intelligence techniques can effectively simulate water quality parameters, and the accuracy of machine learning models can be improved by using wavelet theory. The study conducted in Gao-ping River, Taiwan found that hybrid models with wavelet transform significantly increased the accuracy of ANN and ANFIS models.
There are several methods for modeling water quality parameters, with data-based methods being the focus of research in recent decades. The current study aims to simulate water quality parameters using modern artificial intelligence techniques, to enhance the performance of machine learning techniques using wavelet theory, and to compare these techniques to other widely used machine learning techniques. EC, Cl, Mg, and TDS water quality parameters were modeled using artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). The study area in the present research is Gao-ping River in Taiwan. In the training state, using hybrid models with wavelet transform improved the accuracy of ANN models from 8.1 to 22.5% and from 25.7 to 55.3% in the testing state. In addition, wavelet transforms increased the ANFIS model's accuracy in the training state from 6.7 to 18.4% and in the testing state from 9.9 to 50%. Using wavelet transform improves the accuracy of machine learning model results. Also, the WANFIS (Wavelet-ANFIS) model was superior to the WANN (Wavelet ANN) model, resulting in more precise modeling for all four water quality parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available