4.5 Article

Treatment of tequila vinasse mixed with domestic wastewater in two types of constructed wetlands

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 12, Pages 3072-3082

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2023.189

Keywords

Arundo donax; domestic wastewater; horizontal subsurface flow wetlands; Iris sibirica; vertical upflow wetlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the treatment of tequila vinasse (TV) in two types of constructed wetlands (CWs), showing similar high removal efficiencies for various pollutants. The highest removal percentages were obtained at 40% of dilution in both horizontal subsurface flow wetlands (HSSFWs) and vertical upflow wetlands (VUFWs). This research demonstrates the potential of CWs as an effective treatment system for TV.
Tequila vinasse (TV) is a high-strength effluent generated during the production of tequila, with a chemical oxygen demand (COD) concen-tration of up to 74 g/L. In this study, the treatment of TV was evaluated in a 27-week study in two types of constructed wetlands (CWs), namely horizontal subsurface flow wetlands (HSSFWs) and vertical upflow wetlands (VUFWs). The pre-settled and neutralized TV was diluted at 10, 20, 30, and 40% with domestic wastewater (DWW). Volcanic rock (tezontle) was used as the substrate and Arundo donax and Iris sibirica as emergent vegetation. The two systems showed similar high removal efficiencies for COD, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS), true colour (TC), electrical conductivity (EC), and total nitrogen (TN). The highest average percentages of removal were obtained at 40% of dilution: 95.4 and 95.8% for COD, 98.1 and 98.2% for turbidity, 91.8 and 95.9% for TSS, and 86.5 and 86.4% for TC in the HSSFWs and the VUFWs, respectively. This study demonstrates the potential of CWs for TV treatment as a major step in a treatment system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available