4.7 Article

Analytical tortuosity-porosity correlations for Sierpinski carpet fractal geometries

Journal

CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 124-133

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2015.07.019

Keywords

Tortuosity; Porosity; Sierpinski carpet; Pseudo-fractal; Poorly sorted porous media

Funding

  1. Thermofluids for Advanced Materials (TEAM) laboratory at the University of Toronto
  2. Carbon Management Canada (CMC)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. NSERC Collaborative Research and Training Experience Program (CREATE) Program in Distributed Generation for Remote Communities
  5. Canada Research Chairs Program
  6. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation Early Researcher Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Naturally-occurring porous media, such as sedimentary rock, rarely consist of mono sized particles, but rather tend to consist of distributions of particle sizes (poorly-sorted porous media). In this study, deterministic fractal geometries including a Sierpinski carpet and a slightly altered version of the Sierpinski carpet with a generator that has a circular inclusion were used to provide insight into the poorly-sorted porous media found in sedimentary rock. The relationships between tortuosity and porosity within these fractal geometries were investigated by presenting and applying a novel mathematical approach. We found a new correlation between the tortuosity, tau, and porosity, phi, within the Sierpinski carpet (tau = 3/2 - phi/2), which agrees well with previous empirical observations reported in the literature. We also found an analytical tortuosity-porosity correlation within the circular-based Sierpinski carpet (tau = (1 - 4/pi)phi + 4/pi), which is to the best of the authors' knowledge, the first tortuosity-porosity relationship proposed for such fractal geometry. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available