4.6 Article

The Evolving Nature of Health Technology Assessment: A Critical Appraisal of NICE's New Methods Manual

Journal

VALUE IN HEALTH
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 1503-1509

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.05.015

Keywords

Health Technology Assessment (HTA); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); NHS England; technology evaluation; economic evaluation; methods development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the health technology assessment methods of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and analyzes key decisions.
Objectives: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recently completed a review of its methods for health technology assessment, involving a 2-stage public consultation. We appraise proposed methodological changes and analyze key decisions.Methods: We categorize all changes proposed in the first consultation as critical, moderate or limited updates, considering the importance of the topic and the degree of change or the level of reinforcement. Proposals were followed through the review process, for their inclusion, exclusion, or amendment in the second consultation and the new manual.Results: The end-of-life value modifier was replaced with a new disease severity modifier and other potential modifiers were rejected. The usefulness of a comprehensive evidence base was emphasized, clarifying when nonrandomized studies can be used, with further guidance on real-world evidence developed separately. A greater degree of uncertainty was accepted in circumstances when evidence generation raised challenges, in particular for children, rare diseases, and innovative technologies. For some topics, such as health inequality, discounting, unrelated healthcare costs, and value of information, significant changes were possibly warranted, but NICE decided not to make any revisions at present.Conclusion: Most of the changes to NICE's health technology assessment methods are appropriate and modest in impact. Nevertheless, some decisions were not well justified and further research is needed on several topics, including investigation of societal preferences. Ultimately, NICE's role of protecting National Health Services resources for valuable interventions that can contribute toward improving overall population health must be safeguarded, without accepting weaker evidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available